MISSION 04
Trust & Evaluation
Tests that show what your AI system gets right, what it gets wrong and when that changes, written so your compliance team can follow them.
The problem
AI systems change under you: a new model version, an edited prompt, a new batch of documents. Without tests, the first sign of a regression is a customer complaint.
Public benchmarks don’t say much about your use. What matters is how the system handles your questions, your edge cases and your data.
What we build
- Test sets built from real questions, with expected answers or sources, plus edge cases and deliberate attempts to break it.
- Checks for accuracy, citation correctness, refusals, personal-data leaks, prompt injection and cost per answer.
- An eval runner in CI that blocks a release when scores drop below agreed thresholds.
- Production monitoring that samples live traffic, flags drift and turns new failures into new test cases.
- Reports mapped to the NIST AI RMF or ISO/IEC 42001 when you need them. We don’t certify; your auditor does.
Reference architecture
What you own at the end
- Test sets and the runner, in your repository
- CI configuration and agreed thresholds
- Report templates for engineering and compliance
- A process for adding new failure cases
When it’s not the right fit
Works on new systems and on ones you already run. If nothing depends on the output yet, a short spot-check is enough for now.
Talk about Trust & Evaluation
Tell us roughly what you’re trying to build. A few sentences is plenty. We’ll reply by email.
Start a conversation